Author Archive | James McRitchie

Push for Increased Gender Diversity in the Boardroom

thirty percent coalitionThe Thirty Percent Coalition’s Institutional Investors continued their active “Adopt a Company” campaign following a series of letters sent to approximately 160 companies in the S&P 500 and Russell 1000 with no women on their boards. The third letter writing campaign to increase gender diversity in the boardroom in the fall of 2014 was supported by representatives of investors representing $3 trillion in assets under management, signed by pensions, state officials, mutual funds, investment managers, foundations, religious institutions, and women’s organizations across the US.  Continue Reading →

Continue Reading · 0

Events CorpGov.net publisher James McRitchie will attend:
Mosaic Dialogue Series: Are Meaningful Shareholder Proposals a Thing of the Past? Anne Simpson, CalPERS; Darla C. Stuckey, Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals. John Wilcox, of SODALI, will moderate webcast. March 5.
Disney shareholder meeting, San Francisco, March 12.
ICGN Boston Event – 29-30 September, Westin Copley Plaza in Boston, MA.
CII’s 2015 fall conference. Event will take place from Wednesday, September 30 to Friday, October 2 at the Westin Copley Plaza in Boston, MA.

Continue Reading ·

Proxy Access: Keith Higgins Speaks on SEC’s (i)(9) Review

Broc Romanek

Broc Romanek, Editor of TheCorporateCounsel.net & CompensationStandards.com

Yesterday (2/10/2015), Corp Fin Director Keith Higgins delivered this interesting speech entitled “Rule 14a-8: Conflicting Proposals, Conflicting Views.” There are some really interesting things in this speech on counterproposals, etc., although there isn’t much that helps those companies grappling with proxy access shareholder proposals this proxy season (but there is some, such as #6 below). Here’s some notables from Keith’s speech: Continue Reading →

Continue Reading · 0

Increase Retail Shareholder Participation in Proxy Process

recommendedAs I have been mentioning, I will be on a panel at the 2/19 SEC Roundtable discussing how to increase retail shareholder participation in the proxy process. It is the night before the event; so I’m trying to boil it all down, knowing I’ll probably only get a few minutes to say anything. The previous posts are all well and good about things that should be done. I tried to focus on what the SEC could do to help, since they are holding the event. Now that our panel is about to convene, I’m just going to mention what could prompt participation, whether or not it requires anything from the SEC.

From the SEC notice: This panel will focus on strategies for increasing retail shareholder participation in the proxy process. The panel will discuss how technology – by providing better access to information or easier means of voting – might affect retail participation. In addition, the panel will discuss whether the format of disclosure could be improved to increase the engagement of shareholders and how the mechanics of voting could be improved to affect retail shareholder participation.  Continue Reading →

Continue Reading · 2

Recommendations to Increase Retail Shareholder Participation

Getting Retail Shareholders to Participate in Proxy Process (Don't call them VIFs)

Getting Retail Shareholders to Participate in Proxy Process (Don’t call them VIFs)

I will be on a panel at the 2/19 SEC Roundtable discussing how to increase retail shareholder participation in the proxy process. Now is the time to boil my rambling posts down to recommendations to increase retail shareholder participation. The SEC agenda is in bold italics; my advice is not.

This panel will focus on strategies for increasing retail shareholder participation in the proxy process. The panel will discuss how technology – by providing better access to information or easier means of voting – might affect retail participation. In addition, the panel will discuss whether the format of disclosure could be improved to increase the engagement of shareholders and how the mechanics of voting could be improved to affect retail shareholder participation.  Continue Reading →

Continue Reading · 0

Retail Shareholder Proxy Participation: Part 3 – VIFs & CITs

elephant in the roomI will be on a panel at the 2/19 SEC Roundtable discussing how to increase retail shareholder participation in the proxy process. The SEC agenda is in bold italics.  Our thoughts on VIFs and CITs are in normal type. Part 1 is here. Part 2 here.

This panel will focus on strategies for increasing retail shareholder participation in the proxy process. The panel will discuss how technology – by providing better access to information or easier means of voting – might affect retail participation. In addition, the panel will discuss whether the format of disclosure could be improved to increase the engagement of shareholders and how the mechanics of voting could be improved to affect retail shareholder participation. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading · 0

Retail Shareholder Proxy Participation: Part 2 – CDV

MoxyVote: The closest we got to open and robust CDV

Moxy Vote: The closest we got to open and robust CDV

The last set of questions for panel at the 2/19 SEC Roundtable deal with client directed voting (CDV). Below are a few thoughts with the help of readers. I welcome further comments. The SEC agenda and questions are in bold italics.  Our thoughts are in normal type. Part 1 is here.

This panel will focus on strategies for increasing retail shareholder participation in the proxy process. The panel will discuss how technology – by providing better access to information or easier means of voting – might affect retail participation. In addition, the panel will discuss whether the format of disclosure could be improved to increase the engagement of shareholders and how the mechanics of voting could be improved to affect retail shareholder participation. 

The SEC raises several questions in their last group of questions for the panel on client directed voting, which I discuss below. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading · 0

Retail Shareholder Participation in the Proxy Process: Part 1

Simplified Proxy Voting Diagram

Simplified Proxy Voting Diagram

As mentioned before, I will be on a panel at the 2/19 SEC Roundtable discussing how to increase retail shareholder participation in the proxy process. I’ve been collecting a few thoughts with the help of readers. Time is a major constraint, so I will need to prioritize my main points and will probably end up with a few bullet points by the time Thursday rolls around. In the meantime, I welcome further comments. The SEC agenda is in bold italics.  Our thoughts are in normal type. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading · 0

Video Friday: Triple Feature on Shareholder Engagement

the engagement pyramidEngagement is, or should be, the common theme of our three videos. CalPERS argues it gives them a seat at the table. Professor Damodaran extols the importance of engagement as a possibility. As a shareholder, what avenues are open? In Davos, I think they looked through the wrong lens. Instead of engagement, they focused on an assumed end-goal that rules out other human values. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading · 0

SEC Panelists & Agenda for Proxy Voting Roundtable

Seal of SECThe Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the agenda and panelists for its February 19 roundtable on ways to improve the proxy voting process.

The roundtable, announced in January, will begin at 9:30 a.m. and will be divided into two panels.  Participants on the first panel will focus on the state of contested director elections and whether changes should be made to the federal proxy rules to facilitate the use of universal proxy ballots by management and proxy contestants.  Participants also will discuss the state law, logistical, and disclosure issues presented by a possible universal proxy ballot process. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Directors Forum 2015: Part 3

Jeffrey C. Smith

Jeffrey C. Smith

Disclaimer: I’m sharing a few notes from Directors Forum 2015 held at San Diego University beginning 2/25/2015 and ending 2/27/2015. The Forum is held under the Chatham House Rule, so you won’t read any juicy tidbits here. However, I do hope to give readers some flavor of the topics discussed and a little on the general range of opinions. I have take slight liberties with the rule with regard to individual featured speakers, giving some sense of their talks without revealing the specifics of cases raised or providing quoted material of any substance.

Directors Forum 2015: Jeffrey C. Smith

Smith is managing member, CEO & chief investment officer, Starboard Value LP. Noted that Starboard’s rate of return has been 27.8% v average of 9% for S&P 500 over the same time-period. Only works at companies where he believes shareholders are disgruntled. Discussed various cases, such as Darden. (Darden Shakes Up Its Board After Agitation by Investor Starboard)

When they went in, Darden’s EBITA margin was significantly worse than peers when adjusting for real estate ownership and factoring in a rent subsidy. He wanted to get them more focused on a better return for capital than on growth. Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Directors Forum 2015: Part 2

Stay Or Go

‘Stay Or Go’ Panel

Disclaimer: I’m sharing a few notes from Directors Forum 2015 held at San Diego University beginning 2/25/2015 and ending 2/27/2015. The Forum is held under the Chatham House Rule, so you won’t read any juicy tidbits here. However, I do hope to give readers some flavor of the topics discussed and a little on the general range of opinions. I have take slight liberties with the rule with regard to individual featured speakers, giving some sense of their talks without revealing the specifics of cases raised or providing quoted material of any substance.

Kerrii Anderson

Kerrii Anderson

Directors Forum 2015: Session 3 “Should We Stay or Should We Go? At Play on the Global Stage

Continue Reading →

Continue Reading ·

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes